Restorative Justice adds its name to concern about current child justice arrangements

The Standing Committee for Youth Justice has released a report that criticises the government for its plans to increase the use of digital technology when it comes to sentencing children. It has also written an open letter to The Times, which has been signed by Restorative Solutions' Chief Executive, Gary Stephenson. 

You can read more about the report here http://scyj.org.uk/2018/04/scy... 

The open letter to the Times was as follows:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Recently a 17-year-old boy was sentenced to prison for ten years. He pleaded guilty but his case overran. The judge decided to sentence the boy by video link early on a Monday morning. His Youth Offending Team officer was not consulted about the use of the video link. The boy will have been alone (save for a prison officer) in a small room at the prison when he heard his sentence, isolated from his lawyer and his family. The evidence shows that children (under 18-year-olds) in court, many of whom have communication problems, struggle to understand what is going on and to participate effectively in proceedings. How much more difficult to do so if you are sat hundreds of miles from the court and separated from everybody there by a video screen? The SCYJ research report, published today, shows that children are not only less likely to understand, but they can neither properly consult with their lawyer, parent or guardian, nor communicate adequately with the judge in court. We are concerned that video link risks making it much harder for children to comprehend the seriousness of their crimes and the harm they have caused. Justice by “skype” has been used with adult defendants since 2000, but has only recently begun to be used with child defendants. It is being deployed for first appearances, remand and sentencing hearings, despite strong indications that it impedes children’s participation in the process, prejudices outcomes and undermines the seriousness of proceedings. The government are pressing ahead with proposals to increase the use of video links for child defendants as part of the digital court reform programme and have even suggested that they should plead guilty to serious crimes on their mobile phones. There is no research on the effect on child defendants of being disconnected from the physical court. We call on the government to halt the expansion of justice by skype or mobile for child defendants until we know its effects. Until then, we argue for a firm presumption against the use of video links for child defendants, save for the most exceptional circumstances.

Yours sincerely,

  • Gess Aird, Director, Kinetic Youth

  • Dr Raymond Arthur, Head of Subject (Law), Northumbria School of Law

  • Bob Ashford, Founder, WipetheSlateClean

  • Dr Tim Bateman, Reader in Youth Justice, University of Bedfordshire

  • Bird and Co Solicitors

  • Anthony Book, Treasurer, Standing Committee for Youth Justice

  • Professor Mary Bosworth, Director, Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford

  • Phil Bowen, Director, Centre for Justice Innovation

  • BSB Solicitors

  • Kate Bulman, Registered Nurse

  • Professor Steve Case, Loughborough University

  • Joanne Cecil, Barrister, Garden Court Chambers

  • Louise King, Director, Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE)

  • Dave Clarke, Chair, Secure Accommodation Network (SAN)

  • Criminal Bar Association

  • Peter Dawson, Director, Prison Reform Trust

  • Anne-Marie Day, University of Wolverhampton

  • Anne-Marie Douglas, CEO, Peer Power

  • John Drew, Chair, Criminal Justice Alliance

  • Caroline Dyer, Chair, YOT Managers Cymru

  • Kathy Evans, CEO, Children England

  • Natasha Finlayson, CEO, Become

  • Rhona Friedman, Solicitor, Commons Law

  • Kamini Gadhok, CEO, Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists

  • Professor Loraine Gelsthorpe, Director, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge

  • Penelope Gibbs, Director, Transform Justice

  • Professor Barry Goldson, Charles Booth Chair of Social Science, University of Liverpool

  • Pippa Goodfellow, Senior Lecturer in Youth Justice, Nottingham Trent University

  • Dr Faith Gordon, Director, Youth Justice Network, and Lecturer in Criminology, University of Westminster.

  • Dr Di Hart, Children’s Services Consultant

  • Tom Hawker-Dawson, Bye-Fellow in Law, Downing College, University of Cambridge.

  • Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth, Newcastle Law School

  • Professor Mike Hough, Birkbeck, University of London

  • Professor Carolyn Hoyle, Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford

  • Dr Jessica Jacobson, Director, Institute for Criminal Policy Research

  • Peter Jones, Director of Social Justice and Rehabilitation, Catch22

  • Lorraine Khan, Associate Director for Children and Young People, Centre for Mental Health

  • Dr Caroline Lanskey, Lecturer in Applied Criminology, University of Cambridge

  • Caroline Liggins, Solicitor, Hodge Jones & Allen LLP

  • Ross Little, Chair, National Association for Youth Justice (NAYJ)

  • London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association

  • Yvonne MacNamara, CEO, The Traveller Movement

  • Richard Mold, Director, Devon Young People’s Trust

  • Catherine O’Neill, Chair, Intermediaries for Justice

  • Mary O’Shaugnessy, Consultant

  • Professor Nicola Padfield, Professor of Criminal and Penal Justice, University of Cambridge

  • Professor Jo Phoenix, Chair of Criminology, Open University

  • Joe Russo, CEO, The Enthusiasm Trust

  • Professor Hannah Smithson, Professor of Criminology and Youth Justice, Manchester Metropolitan University.

  • Enver Solomon, CEO, Just for Kids Law

  • Martha Spurrier, Director, Liberty

  • Christopher Stacey, Co-Director, Unlock

  • Gary Stephenson, CEO, Restorative Solutions

  • Greg Stewart, Director, GT Stewart Solicitors & Advocates

  • Jacob Tas, CEO, Nacro

  • John Tenconi, Chair, Michael Sieff Foundation

  • Lesley Tregear, Chair, Association of YOT Managers

  • George Turner, CEO, Carney’s Community

  • Alexandra Wigzell, Chair, Standing Committee for Youth Justice

Start a conversation

We’d love to talk to you about how we can find a solution for you.

or simply call us on 01772 842109

What people say about Restorative Solutions

I'm so glad I am working with RJ. I don't know who would listen to me if it wasn’t for you.
A Person Harmed by Crime
RJ is very underrated and I certainly think we should be using it more.
A Professional who Referred Someone into our Service
Very satisfied – it’s been a great service. A worthwhile process for me and I hope for the offenders. Staff have been great and I would like to thank them.
A victim
It was the right thing to do. Both victims told me to let go of what happened. I didn't want to hear it but they both forgave me and said I should move on. I have taken that on and thought about it and I have come to terms with what happened. You've helped me significantly. It's as though my head has been lifted of a gigantic weight.
An Offender
Thanks for your time today. I feel like you understand R so well, I really hope you can help him to learn how to be happy.
Feedback from a family in East Kent
Restorative Justice offers a unique opportunity for victims and survivors to move on from and overcome the trauma that can be left with them after experiencing crime. I am exceedingly proud of the work that the team at Restorative Solutions do in supporting our community. We should always consider the needs of victims of crime and this service exemplifies that sentiment and allows so many to put behind them what can be the worst experience of their lives.
Marc Jones, Lincolnshire Police and Crime Commissioner and Chair of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners.

Case Studies

An Attempted Burglary: Restorative Justice Case Study

When Joanne and her husband had just gone to bed, they heard a really loud bang downstairs. They immediately thought som...

A Workplace Assault: Restorative Justice Case Study

Nick worked at a clothing shop. When he noticed Glenn, a customer, shoplifting, Nick stepped in to challenge him. The po...

A Manslaughter: Restorative Justice Case Study

We received a referral from a Victim Liaison Officer who was working on a manslaughter case. The grandmother advised the...

A Robbery: Restorative Justice Case Study

This Restorative Justice case saw Jamie and Ruth openly communicate in a face-to-face conference. Years before, Jamie at...

A Non-Recent Child Sexual Abuse: Restorative Justice Case Study

The victim in this non-recent child sexual abuse case was a 56-year-old woman called Lisa. Her father sexually abused he...

A Creeper Burglary: Restorative Justice Case Study

This was a case of an overnight “creeper” burglary in a residential area where the harmer had gained access through an u...

Our Partners

Insights, Articles & Advice

The Victims' Commissioner Has Launched the 2022 Victims' Survey

Dame Vera Baird QC, the Victims’ Commissioner, has launched the 2022 Victims’ Survey. The survey should only take around...

Read More

An Excellent RJ Conference in Merseyside

An Excellent RJ Conference in Merseyside...

Read More

The 5 ‘R’s of Restorative Justice: Are They Always Applicable?

The 5 ‘R’s of Restorative Justice: Are They Always Applicable?...

Read More

Get News and Updates

Start a conversation 01772 842109